Who killed Princess Diana?

RIP Princess DianaSavile and DiDiana MurderedWhite Fiat UnoPrincess Diana CentrepointDianasDeathPetrified SASSAS Hit SquadSavile and Philip at Stoke MandevillePhilip Hates MeGeorge SmithElm ListCliff Richard Jill DandoCliff and DianaDianacover-upJim Fixed ItDi CrashPrince Charles Jimmy Savileprincess-diana2

On this day, in 1997, the world was shaken by the news that Princess Diana had been killed in a car crash in Paris.

Despite many inquests taking place, there has never been a definitive account of exactly how she died.

Various theories have emerged over the years, the most popular being that she was murdered by Mi6 because she was planning to marry Dodi Fayed, the Egyptian son of Harrods owner Mohamed Al-Fayed.

If this was the case, however, why was another attempt made on her life a year before her friendship with Dodi Al Fayed had even developed?

You see, Diana was meant to be assassinated in March 1996.

The assassination attempt was made using a white Fiat Uno- the very same car implicated in the Paris crash that killed Diana.

The 1996 attempt failed but it proves beyond doubt that the British Establishment wanted rid of Diana for their own reasons and her death had nothing to do with her plans to marry an Egyptian.

Her death was ordered because she knew all about Britain’s filthy secrets.

Diana should have died in 1996.

By an act of God, she survived that attempt.

Unfortunately, 18  months later, she wasn’t so lucky.

This Mirror article from March 1996, reports on the crash:

” Princess Diana was “extremely shaken” but unhurt last night after being involved in a five-car pile·up in her BMW.

Witnesses said Di – white-faced with shock – was lucky to escape injury as a Fiat Uno  smashed into the driver’s side of her car.

She was driving her dark blue BMW coupe back to Kensington Palace alone after a private visit to a friend when the accident happened.

A passing motorist said the princess was “extremely” lucky. The mayhem left other vehicles “mangled” wrecks.

Witness Peter Hull added: “She looked totally dazed . Her face was shocked white.”

Immediately after the smash in Chelsea, Diana hailed a black cab which took her to the local police station. Officers then drove her home.

It is thought she was following advice that if there was ever any trouble she should head to the nearest police station.

The crash involved a white Fiat Uno which was parked outside a casino in Cromwell Road.

Passers-by said a blue Porsche pulled up behind it and the driver vanished into the casino, leaving staff to park the powerful sports car.

A doorman got behind the wheel but his foot slipped on the Porsche pedals, sending it flying into the Fiat which then careered across the busy two-lane road.

It collided first with Di’s BMW, then a following blue Mercedes. A pink Porsche was also damaged in the confusion.

Di’s smart BMW, which was on loan after an aide smashed her own car last week, was left with a severely damaged front wing. The driver’s door was also smashed in.

But Mr Hull, 25, said she climbed out unhurt. “I saw her face as I passed a mere second after the impact,” he said. “She looked as if she didn’t know what had hit her.”

It was a miracle she wasn’t hurt.”

Another eyewitness said: “I could not believe it when I saw all these cars in a mess.

“I was amazed to see Princess Diana behind the wheel. She looked really shaken up. A taxi driver was being very protective and told everyone else to go away.

“It was a really nasty accident – she was lucky to escape unhurt.

From the look on Diana’s face it seemed as if she was thinking, `God, I don’t need this sort of thing to happen to me right now – I’ve got enough going on in my life without this’. “

The accident happened the night before Diana was due to fly to the island of Barbuda on holiday with sons William and Harry”.


The White Uno’s significance in the 1997 Paris crash is detailed in the Express:

” A WHITE Fiat Uno suspected of colliding with Diana and Dodi’s Mercedes had paintwork matching samples found in the wreckage, the inquest heard yesterday.

There was also evidence to suggest that James Andanson, a French royal photographer who owned the car, had been in Paris following the couple on the night of the crash, despite his earlier denials.

Andanson, who died in a car fire in 2000, is said by Mohamed Al Fayed to have been an MI6 agent in a plot to lure Diana and Dodi into the Alma tunnel and force them off the road.

But the photographer told police hunting the white Fiat Uno involved in the crash that he was not in Paris on the fateful night.”

Princess Diana died in 1997.

She should have died a year before.

Proof-positive that her death was not linked to Dodi Al-Fayed.

Is it a more likely theory that Diana had knowledge of the powerful VIP paedophile ring linked to the UK Government, the BBC and the Royal Family that has been operating in the UK for over 50 years?

Could this knowledge have led to her death?

Quite possibly, yes.

As Patron of hundreds of charities, Diana had a special affinity for the homeless charity Centrepoint, but, as with most things in filthy Britain, Centrepoint may not be as it seems to be:

What do we really know about the young people’s homeless charity Centrepoint?

It was established in Soho in 1969 by Reverend Kenneth Leech.

Reverend Leech wanted young homelesspeople to have a night shelter.

Reverend Leech knew the Kray twins.

Reverend Leech was the “advisor on exorcism and the occult” to the London Bishops.

Many young people who go to Centrepoint are vulnerable and have been in and out of the care system.

Many young people who go to Centrepoint could disappear and nobody would know about it.”

Could a young person have confided in Diana about children going missing from care and ending up in VIP boy-brothels?

As Diana herself once said:

” Anyone in distress can always call me. I will come running, wherever they are.”

Did someone in distress call her and divulge a most terrible secret?

In the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal, the full truth about how close he was to Prince Charles has emerged.

Despite Savile being a murderous child-rapist and procurer of children for VIP filth, Charles didn’t let that stand in the way of their friendship.

Diana even described Savile as a “sort of mentor to Charles” and Savile was a regular at their home.

Did Diana find out what Savile was really up to and threaten to expose what she knew?

Following her death in 1997, a strange article appeared in the Daily Record:

The sick, the lame and the dispossessed were grieving last night for the woman who gave them hope in a world of despair.

Diana had made charity work her life’s crusade, dubbing herself the “Queen of Hearts in that famous Panorama interview.

She once said: “I pay great attention to people and I always remember them. Every visit, every meeting is special.

“Nothing gives me greater happiness than trying to help the most vulnerable in society.”

” The news shocked veteran entertainer Sir Jimmy Savile, who was involved in fund- raising with Diana.

He said:

“It will be days, if not weeks, before those of us who knew her will be able to come to terms with this totally impossible happening.”

In 1989, Buckingham Palace was rocked by allegations by royal servant, George Smith, who claimed he had been raped by a senior staff member.

He also sensationally claimed that the staff member had been in a relationship with Prince Charles, who covered-up the rape.

Diana was so shocked by these revelations that she took it upon herself to interview Smith and record what he said. Smith repeated his claims that he had been raped and also stated that homosexuality was rife at the palace.

The recordings were at the heart of the collapsed Paul Burrell butler trial and to this day have never been made public. It’s highly likely that George Smith also confided in Diana about child-abuse linked to the Royals and Diana began to keep a dossier of what she knew.

Less than 18 months after the death of Diana, the country was shocked by news that Jill Dando had been brutally murdered.

We now know that Jill was herself investigating a VIP paedophile ring linked to the BBC and beyond.

She knew all about Jimmy Savile and his child-raping murderous ways and was soon shot dead with a bullet to the head.

Jill’s fiancé, Alan Farthing, came face-to-face with her killer but forgot to tell the police.

Alan has since risen through the ranks of the medical profession and is now the doctor responsible for the birth of Kate and William’s new baby.

Was his promotion linked to Jill’s murder?”

Cliff Richard was a close friend of both Diana and Jill but as we now know, Cliff is really nothing like his wholesome Christian persona.

Cliff has himself been named as a visitor to the notorious boy-brothel Elm Guest House, where vulnerable children were trafficked from local care homes to be abused by filthy VIPs.

Perverted MP, Cyril Smith also visited the sordid Elm along with many other prominent men.

Cliff was interviewed at length by detectives investigating the murder of Jill on several occasions.

Why was he such an important ‘ witness’ ?

Cliff was also involved in a porn investigation with Jimmy Savile and Myra Hindley protector, Lord Longford.

By a strange coincidence the Mirror recently reported on the Elm Guest House and claims that Diana was aware of abuse allegations there and was in close contact with a victim:

” Another victim of the Elm  guest house scandal believes Princess Diana saved his life, the Sunday People has revealed.

The man, now in his forties, met the princess when he was sleeping rough  outside a London church.

He claims he was subjected to horrific abuse at the Elm from the age of 10  while he was in care at Grafton Close children’s home.

Diana gave him food and helped him find a temporary home as he battled to  rebuild his life in his twenties after escaping care.

He left a tribute to Diana at Kensington Palace when she died in the Paris  car crash of 1997.

The man said: “I have rebuilt my life and I owe it all to Diana.

She kept in touch with me even after she’d helped my back on my feet. I have  lost a real friend.”

The man claims he saw money exchanged with his then carer and his abusers at  the Elm guest house before he was taken back to the Grafton Close  home.”

In the comments section of a website discussing a high-level paedophile ring the following statement was made:

Members of SO19 know about the kids home behind Waterloo Station where they used to drop of and collect a senior royal. Good few years ago though!”

In February 2013, an elite police officer, Colin Smelt, was found with dead with gunshot wounds at his home in Camden.

He was a Royal Protection Officer with the Met.

Apparently there are no suspicious circumstances surrounding his death.

Have witnesses to sordid crimes been permanently silenced?

Was Diana killed by the British Establishment to prevent their filthy secrets being exposed?

In 2013, the Metropolitan Police, were passed explosive information that the SAS were involved in the death of Diana.

According to the Express:

” AN SAS soldier’s claims that the elite regiment ­murdered Princess Diana are “utterly convincing”, police have been told.

” Soldier N apparently claimed Diana and Dodi’s driver Henri Paul were blinded by an intense flash of light moments before he lost control of their ­Mercedes. The claim appears to support testimony from an ex-spy at the inquest into Diana and Dodi’s death.

The former MI6 agent told the hearing that he was aware of a colleague’s proposal to kill Serbian leader ­Slobodan Milosevic by using a strobe light in a tunnel to distract his driver, causing a crash.

And he revealed the existence of a shadowy unit within the SAS known as The Increment which comprises troops from the SAS and SBS for the purposes of carrying out lethal operations on behalf of MI6.

Diana, Dodi and driver Paul died when their car smashed into a pillar in the Pont de L’Alma underpass in Paris in August 1997. A bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones, was critically injured but survived.”

For some unknown reason, the Met soon closed down their investigation, claiming there was no truth to the allegations.

How very, very strange indeed.

It would appear that the powers-that-be have spent all these years trying to prevent us from finding out truth about who really killed Princess Diana.

But despite that, the truth will out anyway.

It’s only a matter of time.




82 thoughts on “Who killed Princess Diana?

  1. Pingback: Who killed Princess Diana? | Alternative News Network

  2. The same day as the crash an ex-intelligence man we knew who spent his life in the intel world said it was because she was going to take her landmine campaign to Palestine, this would showcase to the world what Israel is doing.

    The homosexual Russian spy Sir Anthony Blunt said the Royal Family are secret Jews (if they were not then Rothschild would have got rid of them like they did in France etc.)

    Diana had another previous relationship with a London Muslim doctor, but he was scared off.

    The info is her and Dodi were for real and the royal Jews could not countenance her with a Muslim, and El Fayed was right: the Duke of dEinburgh was party to the killing as was Mossad.

    • I think El Fayed was much more involved in the whole caper than we are being lead to believe…..methinks he doth protest too much.

      • His only son died in that crash. Accident or not. He was beside himself with grief. You really think he would have for even a moment diced with the safety of his son? I am not apologist for fayed. In fact, does anyone else remember it being in the press that the bloke would lend his Berkshire cottage to a friend who liked young boys? He was also a one time friend of Nazi plotter and traitor Tiny Rowland, even if he did eventually trick the nazi out of Harrods in a tax fiddle set up by Rowland. Maybe the only good thing fayed did. In on the assasination of Diana and his only son, though? I can`t believe that.

    • I have no idea about most of that, Brian, but how convenient if the finger were pointed at the Duke of Edinburgh who is elderley and not due to inherit the throne. A moot point anyway as the truth will never ever be officially revealed, much less an arrest made. If it had been the arms industry they would have acted much sooner.

  3. This Rev leech was not an expert in the occult, you are mixing him up with the Rev Christopher Neil-Smith.

    The SAS are pictured as action men heros, they are not they are murderers for hire, Rudolph Hess, Christopher Shale and others have been killed by them, a man who has no conscience is a coward.

  4. Looking back the best politician of that era was Enoch Powell, he spoke for the people and he broke ranks to tell us what the elite had in store for us exactly as did George Orwell.

    But the elite had blackmailed Ted Heath over his sex perversion antics and they got him into the Prime Minister’s position where he then used every hate mechanism of the pooof to damage Enoch.

    But Enoch was such a gentleman he never let slip about Heaths boy-nobbing activiities at Barnabus house and on his yacht etc.

    He could have destroyed Heath and sometimes I wish he had done so, as the jews just tightened their grip and under Heath pushed us into the EU on very bad terms.

  5. One thing always puzzled me, and it still does, and it is this: the car that ‘crashed’ in the tunnel, from early photographs, appeared to be virtually intact, save for the front bumper which was somewhat dislodged – and it even looked like it was done deliberately, i.e., with tools, to give the appearance of a shunt. Now, the photos that spread around by the MSM show the vehicle aboard a flat-bed truck, virtually crushed to bits.

    Here’s what I thought about that…
    1. If, as was seen in other photos / vids, there was virtually zero damage to the interior of the car, nor to the passengers (no real blood spilled), we even saw pics of Di (RIP) lying down across the back seat, which begs the question: why was the car presented in such a crushed state? To answer that, when I first saw the ‘crushed car’ pics, I too, thought, nobody could have walked away from that….that is, until I saw the earlier pics of the virtually ‘intact car’…and then all bets were off.
    2. The list of irregularities about this case, including the time delays in getting the injured to hospital – just a few minutes away; together with a local ambulance that ‘got lost’ in its own back yard – warrants an intense reinvestigation by competent authorities.
    3. The ‘crashed car’ placement – by the 13th pillar, blah, blah, blah….in the real world of physical dynamics, how possible would it really be to cause a heavy, well-constructed and possibly ‘armoured’ vehicle to roll-up (or so it seemed to me, see above) to the wall, and gently nudge it, with such catastrophic consequences? In a world not devoid of common sense – it would not. That would be like saying 2x 110-storey buildings could be reduced to a talcum-powder consistency and virtually ‘disappear’ into their respective ‘building footprint’ in under 11-seconds (for each of them) – I mean, who would believe that?!
    4. And how did those two young lads manage such emotional ‘control’ on the days up to, and of, the funeral? It was simply inhuman…or something??

    Those who appear to be above the law, and protected by sycophantic facilitators and enablers, will soon discover a far greater universal law will come into play – and from that, there is no escape…for any of them.

    Like all things, people know the truth (or bits of it) regarding this and all of the other issues talked about in the world where common sense rules, unfortunately, they are too enamoured of their earthly ‘perks and privileges’ or too cowardly to speak out, or perhaps they feel bound by silken threads of what is truthfully a false loyalty…whichever it may be, sooner or later, truth will out.

    Pax Y’all

    pax verbum

    • It was a replacement car organised by El Fayed and not the armour plated original limo….in answer to your crushed car, take a decco at the 7/7 Tavistock Square bus…..bit of an explosion and then shown decapitated – obviously for major effect .

    • PVC – I believe the original limo was ‘stolen’ two weeks before and been ‘repaired’ which could easily have allowed for remote modifications to be made – aka’Boston brakes’ to be fitted which would/could facilitate exact control of the vehicle, which was towed away immediately and never examined -despite Mercedes offering to do so. Easy peasy.

      • Thanks for that. Yes the white Uno thing is rather spooky, if nothing else, but other than that to hit a car with the aim of IT hitting another car i.e the target vehicle sounds a bit optimistic to say the least unless it was just staged as a frightener or to give her a warning.

        Alternatively it was all part of the plan to make out that they were trying to kill her then leading up to the main faked event in Paris with a doppleganger..

        Who was the door man and was he a real door man? Was the owner of the Porsche in on it too?
        So many unanswered questions.

        There was also another wierd report of Prince Charlie Boy when in Paris saying “That’s very satisfactory” when visiting the hospital that the ambulance carrying the ‘injured’ Diana had taken over an hour to reach, when it was only a few minutes away from the crash scene. Why would he say such a strange thing?

      • Who knows, they may have her squirreled away somewhere…she may even be the mother of her own grandchild…similar to how Beyonce’s offspring was conceived.

        You just never know what these creatures are capable of.

      • “Plastic surgery is a wonderful thing if you need it, even you might have heard of it. ”

        So now I’m stupid is that it ?

        A classic example of projection from some an IQ low enough to lump all homosexuals in with pedophiles.

      • And I suppose it is homosexuals that are raping all those young girls too.

        Your use of the phrase “anti-family heterophobic vile lifestyles” is indicative of a hopoophibic religious based agenda.

        And apparently by your standards people who are celibate are also “anti-family”.

        You are coming across as a programmed religious zealot in this thread, and are in fact clouding the issue with this paranoid agenda you cleave to.

      • My standards are Yashua Messiah’s standards.

        What have sodomites got to do with raping girls? Your bringing that irrelevant topic into the equation just shows that your augument is made of straw.

        The same applies to your celibate irrelevant nonsense.

        The Truth is not programming – you as a recovering Catholic (whatever that is) are the one struggling with programming – satanic cult programming.

      • “My standards are Yashua Messiah’s standards.”

        Somebody put a bullet in me if I ever become so addle brained that I begin to live my life based on a book written by unverifiable sources, which has been adulterated countless times by religious zealots.

        Never mind spewing hate toward other human beings.

      • Being an ex-Roman Catholic you’re not qualified to discuss matters Spiritual – out of your depth doesn’t even come near.

        Following Yashua Messiah is not a religion, nor did He come to start a religion.

        Being an ex-Roman Catholic you would know far more about religion and hatred than me. Be my guest and please take the floor. LOL

      • @ TND
        Apparently Charles made a right Charlie of himself when he inadvertently said, ‘Félicitations’ to the doctors who had (mis ) treated Diana .A bit of a Freudian slip I think.

  6. There is a book in progress which lifts the lid from the SAS from murdering German nationals in W W II right through to the murder of Rudolf Hess and others up to the present day, SAS snipers have hidden and killed lots of people and must be accountable, this book lifts the lid, from an insider who was badly treated.

    • Why shouldn`t Hess and his ilk have been shot? We were at war. The Nazis were torturing and murdering many, even their own if suspected of dissent, in addition to Jews. Pity they didn`t do for Hitler, Himmler, Hess and Goering years before WWII. Without Hitler in particular, Golden Dawn and their lot wouldn`t have dared gone so far. Hitler especially raised the impetus. I`m glad at least some of those b`stards were done for instead of being helped to escape and given sanctuary by those who should not have.

      • You need to deprogramme your mind of Jew propaganda, otherwise you will look foolish on this thread. Just the word ‘Nazi’ was a Jewish insulting creation towards German Nationalists. The Jews declared war on Germany in 1933 and via their proxies in London and Washington (the Jew Roosevelt) started to make life more difficult financially for the Germans forcing Hitler to start bartering goods internationally and thereby by-passing Rothschild Jew controlled banks.

        Unfortunately everything you have been taught from the cradle is a pack of lies.

        The Germans were not torturing and murdering many. The Germans only turned on the Jews after their declaration of war against Germany and even then it was only short lived because Hitler wanted to find favour with foreign nations regarding National Socialism so he came down hard on his people to end the retaliation against the Jews.

        At the same time Hitler was assisting Jews in emmigrating to Palestine and did so until 1938.

      • I just finished watching that last pm coincidentally…what an eye opener that was for me.

        Many years ago I read where after the war Gen Patton stated that “we fought for the wrong side”.

        That always puzzled me, but it makes perfect sense to me now…especially when you consider his untimely and suspicious death shortly thereafter.

  7. On September 12, which is 2 weeks time, various child protection agencies are going to have a march againt homosexuals in Rotherham, please be there and bring a whistle and a placard. Children must be protected.

    • Homosexuals and pedophiles…two entirely different issues.

      Tying one to the other only adds to the problem, and divides and confuses people…which is what the murderous pedophiles want.

    • So which agencies are these, specifically? How did you learn of this march? Also, why just against homosexuals? The recent Rotherham cases have highlighted only pre-pubescent and teenage girls as having been mentally, emotionally, physically and sexually tortured and raped. So again, why just against homosexuals? Are you a member of a strict religious sect? Are these `child protection agencies` also related to any religious sect? It doesn`t sound as if it is soley against child abuse, does it? More like an added agenda.

      • Before I was able to see through my catholic indoctrination I also believed all homosexuals were perverts.

        All it took was a little critical thinking.

        – A recovering cathoholic

      • All religions are based on fear. Fear of hell. Some have a greater emphasis on agape, but the hell (or similar) element is there. As far as gays are concerned, I haven`t come across many at all. I guess they have never really come into my social circle. So, whether it`s ok or not isn`t something i`ve spent much time thinking about. However, i`m sure many gays would be aghast at the idea of kiddy fiddling, so a march against them as opposed to against paedos is a bit unusual. Even RC`s don`t organise public marches against them, at least not in the UK. So, some other more politically `active` religion? As for you being a recovering RC, isn`t it wonderful to be free of thought instead of shackled – and to what is actually a very foreign religion anyway?

      • “…a march against them as opposed to against paedos is a bit unusual.”

        Not really unusual, its a common tactic used to divide the opposition into warring factions, in order to deflect attention away from the murderous pedophiles that control society.

  8. I dont know how relevant is this, but “national dwarf’s” vid from 1983 is kinda revealing. At about 1:56 see the flag of France turning into a pentagram/star of David

  9. It is my belief that Mohammad Al Fayed, grieving for his son and bitter toward the Establishment was deliberately used by Jewish pornographer and owner of the ‘Express’ newspaper to divert attention away from the real motive for the murder and thus protect the Establishment. So we had the total farce of the ‘inquest’ and a jury trial. Al Fayed appears as a witness in court looking like an absolute plonker with no credibility, the jury returns the ‘correct’ verdict and Voila! Case closed.

    You are in error sir. The Maudsley Psychiatric Hospital in its 60’s and 70’s programmes linked homosexuality to paedophilia for good reason- a girls sexual organs are not ready until puberty which is why almost all attacks on kiddies are “anal”- e g gay sex.

    This is why to a homosexual it does not matter what sex the child is because its the anus they want, and thus
    the linking between homsexuality and pedophilia is a very close one indeed.

    This ruling was in fact used by the Home Office until around 1982.

    Hope this broadens your education.

  11. The actor Peter Wyngarde was known to brag about bringing boys onto the BBC set and having them in his dressing room.

    There is no way the BBC did not know about this, as in the 1930s Rothschilds apostles, almost all homosexual perverts also bragged about what went on at the BBC.

    So those who say they did not know what Savile was doing are liars.

      • ?? The point is, the act of `the passing of the crown` exists now. Call it succession if you prefer. Ideals are one thing but the system is the way it is, and my point is; we have a monarchy and imo (and no doubt that of many others) Charles should not become king. Even if anyone doesn`t want to believe he arranged it, the bloke causes diplomatic problems with his ramblings. Regardless of whether his comments have merit, he causes trouble for others have to try and put right.

      • The Crown was abolished in 1649 when The Jew backed Oliver Cromwell took Charles I head off. British monarchs ruling by Divine Right ended there. Constitutional Monarchs are not real Monarchs, they are Jew bankster puppet quasi-monarchs.

  12. Just to add to the above: From wikipedia is the following –
    In 1975, he was arrested, convicted and fined £75 for an act of “gross indecency” in the toilets of Gloucester Bus Station, which followed an arrest and caution for similar activities in the toilets at Kennedy Gardens in Birmingham the previous year. After the first incident, Wyngarde was interviewed for the News of the World and the Birmingham-based Sunday Mercury, and asserted that the arrest was due to a misunderstanding; in his defence after the second incident he claimed he had suffered a “mental aberration”. Although it affected his image, particularly with his audience who largely identified him as the ladies’ man Jason King, Wyngarde’s homosexuality was actually well known in acting circles, where he was known by the nickname of “Petunia Winegum”.
    In 1970, Wyngarde recorded an album for RCA Victor entitled simply Peter Wyngarde,
    Track 3 was called ‘Rape’ – charming!
    Also from the tap:
    The BBC used to go mental having to phone the police station to say look Peter Wyngarde was one of their top TV stars and could his latest arrest in a public toilet be overlooked, but Wyngarde, real name (Cyril Louis Goldbert ) would be constantly at it with young lads, he had a bit of an entourage of rent boys that only a top star could afford.
    After losing his TV celebrity status, and squandering a smal fortune on alcohol and bumboys, Wyngarde worked in Austria, acting and directing at the English Theatre in Vienna, and also in South Africa and Germany. He landed the role of General Klytus in the 1980 film version of Flash Gordon, though his face was hidden behind a mask for the part. His distinctive voice is clearly recognisable in the film, I remember a rather glitzy bisexual couple (I won’t say names, but they were well known on the ‘alternative’ scene in Nottingham at the time) who were usually in the Flying Horse on Saturday nights. They would often have a party at their house after the pub or even after the clubs once they had started business. They would particularly do this if a TV or stage star was in the Flying Horse bar and would invite him (invariably a him) back. I remember great excitement and a clamour for invitations to this couple’s when Peter Wyngarde (TV’s Jason King) was in the Fly. The couple would also pick up a rent boy for their joint sexual pleasure. It was in connection with this couple that I first began to hear of drug use among fringes of the homosexual scene. I remember trying cannabis once with a boyfriend I met in the flying Horse, and was given poppers once by another boyfriend at the time, but that is all I saw personally.

    There were loads of rent boys, often the dolly boys on scooter types, there were wealthy gay business men up from London looking for pretty boys to take to smart restaurants and be repaid by a nobbing in their hotel room.

    In those days a phone call from a BBC director would get you off parking charges or being caught out with bum-boys,

  13. It remains a shocking event, perhaps more so with the passage of time. Diana didn’t always behave well but she had a fundamental integrity and idealism which we still miss today.
    I agree that her the crash probably wasn’t an accident. However, I’m inclined to think the target was Dodi, with Diana killed by mistake, probably because someone (Israel or the US?) feared an Arab marrying the mother of an heir to the throne. I think had there been child abuse allegations involved, she would have known about it, and acted it upon it, sooner than 1997.

  14. I appreciate that the prospect of life after death maybe too much for a lot of people to accept but for those who are open minded enough to consider it as a possibility please check out this site which is encyclopedic in it’s content..After all, she did say that “she wouldn’t go quietly” I think we all know that her death wasn’t an accident! http://www.dianaspeaks.info/index.html

    • Life after death or not, I find that website macabre as well as dubious in authenticity. When did Diana ever talk herself up? “I had to die….no one ever touched peoples lives the way I had….“! Really! Either over-imaginative or plain cynical vulturer like money making, in my opinion. She`s gone and should be left to rest in peace. Also, her sons and other family should not have to put up with this sort of thing. It`s indecent.

  15. Just to add, apparently the bodyguard wrote a book on what he eventually remembered. I haven`t and shan`t read it as such a sad event for all in the crash. Anyway, it would have all happened so fast it`s doubtful he will ever remember anything very significant. The poor man was so persecuted, and some of the media seemed to imply he remembered more than he admitted. The extent of his injuries it`s a wonder he lived, and a further wonder he wasn`t turned into a vegetable for life, but – quite apart from how fast it would have happened. It seems the book is worth a read if someone is interested in events leading up to that point. I won`t comment on fayeds apparent accusations against Mr Rees, as fayed was obviously too distraught with grief to think straight and realise how unfair he was being to the man. Even though I am far from a fayed fan I am not going to run him down for going mad with grief.

  16. Prime Minister David Cameron said he refused to discuss paedophilia as he did not want to start a homosexual witch-hunt.

    This was very honest of him because if you look at any of the homosexual magazines they all show men with boys, not men with men, this tells you a lot. And all the adverts in the back seem to be old men looking for teenage boys.

    Also the Cummins report commisiond by the NHS before they declassified homosexuality as a crime did not discriminate between homosexuality and pedophilia, as the two are so closely linked.

    PS Peter Tatchell who describes himself as a well known homosexual, constantly campaigns for sex with boys- not men

  17. This great man warned of the way the country was going downhill, he told of a declining economy, compulsory perversion and eventual ruin.

    Oh how I wish we had listened to him:

  18. We know who how and why !! it is just plain to see now just how corrupt the whole thing has always been..we have the internet now and you can be a journalist in your own right…uploaded on social media and youtube. This has educated us all in such a short time. They are all in it together. We are watching them watching us now. Hence the fence of millions of £ss protecting them in Newport. They fear us alright… and they should !!

  19. Diana said it herself. She was a loose cannon. She was getting stronger by the day after she split with Chucky. Her ‘Queen Of People’s Hearts’ statement was practically a declaration of usurpation.

    • Ursula, You are “spot on” with this last sentence

      What is interesting is that since the new law was implemented, how many people have had information removed from the internet because it suits them for others not to see it. I might throw a couple of names into this murky pond soon, and see what happens to the ripples.

  20. Prince Charles does not produce sperm. This is fact not speculation. This means that AN Others are William and Harry’s fathers. I’m not even a fan of the James Hewitt theory ; it’s too glib. Could Phil’s rumoured son be closing in on the throne? Has anyone else noticed how closely William resembles the current Earl Spencer? Diana’s father wasn’t necessarily Johnnie Spencer so an incest situation isn’t a foregone conclusion. Find the ‘Princes’ fathers and the motive for Diana’s assassination, maybe even the killers would be revealed. Diana was a mere cog in the Royal machine and they will be found out soon together with their dirty linen.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s